ONLINE BANKING

Peoples Online

Access ID

LOCAL LINKS

CITY OF PARIS

THE PARIS NEWS

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

FINANCIAL LITERACY

Use the button below for important information about your account.

NEWS


Welcome to PEOPLES BANK

HISTORY 

NEWS STORIES

RATINGS

Bank

Management

Review

IDC Financial Publishing, Inc.


                                                        

 IDC Management Review

 

Peoples Bank located in Paris, TX received an IDC rank of 277, which placed it in the “Superior” group.

Information in this report is based on the bank’s September 30, 2003 quarterly statement of Condition & Income as filed to the FDIC.  

IDC ranks are based on the bank’s performance of financial ratios.  Ranks range from 1 – 300 (the best). 

Categories of IDS Ratings 

Superior (200 – 300):  Banks rated Superior are simply the best by all measures.  In addition to favorable capital ratios, most consistently generate a return on equity  (ROE) above cost of equity (COE). 

Excellent (165 – 199):  Banks rated excellent are strong institutions.  Their ratios reflect quality management both from a balance sheet and income performance standpoint.  Operating expenses and costs of funding are under control, producing a healthy return on equity (ROE). 

Average (125 – 164):  Banks rated Average meet industry capital standards.  When compared to excellent and superior rated banks, most exhibit lower quality loans and narrower profit margins.  The marginal problems of the average bank require shifts in policies and practices to raise asset quality or improve profits. 

Below Average (75 – 124):  Banks rated Below Average represent institutions under strain.  Average loan delinquency is high.  In many, excess nonperforming assets are above the loan loss reserve and threaten equity capital.  Return on financial leverage is negotiable, on average, due to narrow (or negative) leverage spreads.  Banks are also rated Below Average if they are deemed “Adequately Capitalized” per FDIC capital definitions. 

Lowest Ratios (2 – 74):   The Lowest Ratios group contains some banks with less than the minimum capital required.  In many, increasing loan loss provisions expand net losses on the income statement and, along with the excess of net charge-offs, reduce capital ratios.  A high number of failed banks were rated Lowest Ratios prior to failure.  Banks are also rated Lowest Ratios if they are deemed “Under Capitalized” or “Significantly Under Capitalized” per FDIC capital definitions.  Banks are also rated Lowest Ratios if they are deemed “Adequately Capitalized” and have a high volatility in operating profit margins.  Finally, banks which met the profile of past bank failures due to a lack of core deposits, higher risk assets, and potentially a lack of staffing to manage risks are capped at 72 or 73. 

Rank of One (1):  Banks in the Rank of One group have the highest probability of failure.  Loans 90-days past due and nonperforming assets, on average, exceed the loan loss reserve and equity capital by a wide margin.  Without major balance sheet improvement, these banks will fail.  Banks are also rated Rank of One if they are deemed “Critically Under Capitalized” per FDIC capital definitions. 

Since 1985, over 90 percent of the banks that failed were ranked below 50 by IDS prior to failure.  The vast majority of these failed banks were ranked one.  Any future capital additions or losses or dramatic reductions or increases in nonperforming assets (delinquent loans) can change the bank’s rank.

Fundamentals of IDC’s Analysis...  IDC’s CAMEL

IDS has developed its own version of the commonly cited  “CAMEL” approach to choose the financial rations that have the greatest impact on the quality of an institution.  CAMEL is an acronym that defines a number of areas in which the institution has to perform well in order to be profitable:  Capital adequacy, Asset quality, Margins, Earning asset returns, and Leverage and Liquidity. 

In the following summary, we quantify the performance of Peoples Bank in each area and examine those figures in relationship to each other.

C” Capital Adequacy 

An institution must have enough capital (its own money, invested in business) so that there is a solid cushion available in hard times – for instance, if the loan defaults increase.  That’s why we look at the percent of Equity Capital a bank has, relative to its total assets.  Equity capital represents the amount that an institution’s assets exceed what it owes to depositors and creditors.  Other capital ratios include Tier I (Equity Capital) and Tier II (Equity Capital plus secondary capital, like long-term debt) as a percent of risk-adjusted assets.  Federal regulations define risk-adjusted assets as a measure of potential safety or risk.  Federal regulators consider these capital ratios important measurements and have set minimum levels that institutions must stay above. 

Capital Adequacy ranges from best to worst as follows:  Well Capitalized, Adequately Capitalized, Under Capitalized, and Significantly or Critically Under Capitalized.  Peoples Bank is deemed to be more than “ Well Capitalized.”  It has a strong Tier I equity capital to assets ratio and a total risk-based capital ratio substantially above regulatory requirements.  Strong capital is combined with superior earning power to build new equity capital  (retained earnings) from operating profit.  The bank’s strong capital position and current earning power are sufficient to withstand severe economic risks. 

“A” Asset Quality 

Asset quality measures how effective an institution is at lending money to people who are willing and able to pay it back.  To see if it’s doing this well, we look at how many delinquent (bad) and nonperforming loans it has on its books, relative to its capital and to the loan loss reserve, which is the fund it has set aside to cover losses from bad loans.  This measures the institution’s asset quality, and consequently the risk to its capital, given delinquent or nonperforming loans default.  Seldom do other rating services, relying only on capital adequacy, scrutinize this factor adequately. 

Nonperforming loans are nonaccrual loans and restructured loans and leases, and all other real estate owned (excluding direct and indirect investments in real estate ventures).  That is, they are so troubled that the institution does not expect repayment in full.  (IDC is not able to determine the underlying collateral value of nonperforming loans based on regulatory information available.) 

Nonperforming loans can have a major impact on both the institution’s profitability and its capital adequacy. Nonaccrual loans are loans that are delinquent for a period beyond 90 days.  The regulators require that interest payments can no longer be accrued.  Because some of these loans don’t pay interest, revenues are reduced.  If the full amount of principal on these loans cannot be recovered, the institution must reserve for and then charge-off (or expense) these loans in addition to any legal and collection fees.  Any time that too many bad loans force an institution to charge-off more money than it has provided for the expense item called “loan loss provision,” its net income is reduced by that amount – what looked like a profit can turn into a loss. 

If nonperforming loans are greater than loan loss reserves, the institution may have to make up the difference out of its equity capital.  If its capital or collateral value is not adequate for this task, the institution may be in danger of failure. 

Asset quality ranges from best to worst as follows:  High, Average, Limited, and Poor.  Peoples Bank has “high” asset quality.  Nonperforming loans present little or no danger to its capital position. 

“M” Margins 

An institution must price its loans and services in addition to investment yields so that there is an adequate difference between what it earns on assets and what it pays savers in interest on deposits and borrowings.  There must be enough total revenues after interest costs to cover operating expenses.  The money left over, after tax, should earn a fair rate of return on equity capital. 

All of these differences between revenues and expenses are called Margins.  And management is measured at the margins.  Together, they determine the overall profitability of the institution.  By looking at each of several margin measurements individually, we can learn a great deal about an institution’s operating and financial strategies. 

Here, we examine three kinds of margins:  Operating Profit Margin, Leverage Spread, and Return on Equity as compared to Cost of Equity Capital.  Margins range from best to worst as follows:  Wide, Average, Narrow, and Negative. 

First, we will review the Operating Profit Margin and Leverage Spread of Peoples Bank. 

Operating Profit Margin is defined as net operating revenue less operating costs (excluding the loan loss provision) divided by net operating revenues (net interest income plus non interest income).  This ratio allows us to focus on how well the institution is controlling its operating costs, which is key to profitability.  Peoples Bank has a “Narrow” margin between operating profits and net operating revenues, demonstrating a high cost of operation.  Peoples Bank has a “high” standard deviation or volatility in the operating margin indicating a complex or high risk profit structure. 

Leverage Spread is the difference between after-tax operating income relative to the cost of funding.  Peoples Bank has a “Wide” margin between after-tax operating returns and funding costs, indicating that it makes very effective use of leveraged funds. 

The final kind of margin we examine is Return on Equity versus Cost of Equity Capital (ROE vs. COE).  Return on equity measures the percent return the institution earns, overall, on its own equity investment – it is the final measure of profitability.  The cost of equity capital is the return a prudent investor would require for investments of comparable risk. 

Return on equity can be measured in two ways:  First is Book ROE, which simply divides net income by equity capital.  The second way, developed by IDC, is the net operating profit ROE (NOPAT ROE) which divides the sum of net income plus loan loss provision minus net charge-offs by equity capital plus the loan loss reserve.  This method adjusts ROE for the actual loan loss experience to the money the institution has set aside to cover it.  If the provision exceeds actual losses, ROE is increased by that amount and vice versa.  This method also excludes nonrecurring (one time) income or loss whereas Book ROE ignores these impacts, whether positive or negative. 

We compare NOPAT ROE to cost of equity capital.  An ROE above COE adds value to a financial institution.  In comparison, an institution destroys value with an ROE below the cost of equity capital.  Peoples Bank has a return on equity capital above estimated cost of equity capital, providing superior growth from operating profit and enhancing shareholder value and safety. 

“E” Earning Asset Return 

An institution must control its operating (non-interest) expenses so that they do not consume a disproportionate part of its revenues.  We can determine how well it’s doing this by looking at how much money is left from all revenues (from loans, investments, and services) after both operating expenses and taxes have been paid, and a provision set aside for loan losses.  This ratio measures the institution’s “Return on Earning Assets.” 

Earning asset returns measure the institution’s operating strategy.  They measure what the bank’s performance would have been if all the money lent or used to pay funding costs were its own (i.e., no interest had to be paid on saver’s deposits or borrowings).  By temporarily ignoring the role that leverage plays, we get a better picture of how well it’s managing its operating business. 

To do this, we calculate the bank’s after-tax return on earning assets by subtracting operating expenses, loan loss provisions, and taxes from all revenues (including non-interest income and gains or losses on investments).  We adjust this after-tax return to reflect the difference between the loan loss provision and the net charge-offs of loans.  Return on earning assets consists of operating income less operating expense and income taxes, but excludes the cost of funding liabilities. 

Return on assets ranges from best to worst as follows:  High, Average and Low.

Peoples Bank has a High” after-tax return on earning assets (ROEA). 

Now let’s take a look at each of the components of return on earning assets and how the bank performed. 

Current yield on loans.  This includes interest income from loans divided by the average book value of loans.  Peoples Bank earned a “High” yield on loans. 

Loan loss provision.  This expense on the income statement accounts for probable losses as a result of future loan defaults.  High levels indicate that the bank expects future loan losses to increase.  The loan loss provision as a percent of earning assets is “High” for this bank, reflecting above average future loan loss expectations. 

Non-interest income.  This is revenue and income (or loss) from sources other than loans and investments, such as income from fees.  This bank’s ratio of non-interest income as a percent of earning assets is “High.”  It is an important part of its revenue source and profitability.   

Non-interest expense.  The expense ratio equals operating costs divided by average earning assets.  This allows us to focus on how well the bank is controlling its operating costs.  This bank’s ratio of non-interest expense to earning assets is “High.” 

Adjustment to net income.  In this measurement, we focus on how much of the loan loss provision was added to net income.  This bank’s adjustment provides a modest addition to net income, as the loan loss provision exceeds net loan charge-offs. 

“LLeverage and Liquidity 

Leverage returns along with liquidity make up the “L” in IDC’s CAMEL analysis.  First we will look at the institution’s Return on Financial Leverage. 

Return on Financial Leverage – A Measure of the Financial Strategy.  Return on Financial Leverage measures the efficiency with which the institution uses deposits, borrowings, and other forms of debt to leverage its equity capital and reserves.  Return on financial leverage is the product of leverage spread and leverage multiplier. 

Leverage spread compares the after-tax return on earning assets (the measurement of the operating strategy) to the after-tax cost of funding these earning assets.  Leverage multiplier is the amount of deposits and borrowings used in relationship to equity capital and loan loss reserves provided by the institution.  Financial strategy determines how much to leverage capital and at what cost. 

Ratios of Leverage Spread, Leverage Multiplier and Return on Financial Leverage range from best to worst as follows:  High, Average, Low, and Negative.  Peoples Bank has a “High” return on financial leverage.  The cost of funding is “Average,” its leverage spread is “High,” and its leverage multiplier is “Low.” 

Liquidity measures (1) balance sheet cash flow as a percent of the Tier I capital and (2) illiquid loans as a percent of stable deposits and borrowings plus excess liquidity.  The large potential risk is the transfer of consumer deposits from stable low paying deposits to large deposits or borrowings.  This can occur as consumers transfer deposits outside the banking system, requiring banks to attract new funds by increasing deposits over $100,000 or borrowing funds.  The loss of stable low-cost deposits or excessive lending is reflected as a lack of liquidity by an increase to over 100% in the percentage of illiquid loans to stable deposits and borrowings plus excess liquidity.  Negative balance sheet cash flow indicates the inability of the change in retained earnings to finance the change in growth producing assets (plant and equipment, investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries, and other long term assets) or the change in liabilities (excluding retained earnings) is larger than the change in investments and loans.  A negative balance sheet cash flow ratio of –66% to –100%, coupled with a high percentage of loans to earning assets, illustrates a lack of liquidity.  A percentage more negative than –100% is a severe illiquid position, especially if nonperforming loans are in excess of 3% of total loans.  Peoples Bank has a percentage of balance sheet cash flow to Tier I capital between a negative 66% and a positive 66% illustrating ample liquidity.  The percentage of illiquid loans  to stable deposits and borrowings plus excess liquidity is less than 100% and illustrates ample liquidity. 

In summary, Peoples Bank received an IDC rank of 277, which placed it in the Superior group.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and US Government insure all deposits up to $100,000. 

This report was prepared by IDC Financial Publishing, Inc. of Hartland, Wisconsin.  For more information on this or other institutions, contact IDC at 1-800-525-5457 or by e-mail at idcfp@execpc.com. 

Ranks provide IDC’s opinion about the relative value of financial ratios, and are subject to limitations in their use.  In IDC’s opinion, the selected ratios provide an ample financial picture for rating a bank. However, the quality of individual banks can also be influenced by factors not taken into account in this analysis.  The quality of a bank is not fixed over time; ranks may change with changes in management, strategy, or external conditions. 

The data for calculations and ranks and other information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and accurate.

Disclaimer: This site is brought to you by Peoples Bank. For your convenience, this site includes an Internet search engine and links to other 3rd parties. Peoples Bank does not endorse or guarantee the search engine or 3rd party sites. The products and services offered on 3rd party sites, are NOT products of Peoples Bank.

Copyright © 2004.                Last Updated - August 31 2006

WEATHER

SEARCH THE WEB





MARKETS